The government says such data is not necessary for a system that would rely on biometric authentication

The UK's proposed digital ID scheme has drawn criticism for not recording whether a person is male or female - traditionally a core identifier alongside name and age - after the government deemed it "not necessary" for identification.

The scheme, unveiled by Prime Minister Keir Starmer last year, has been pitched as a secure, free digital credential stored on smartphones to replace physical documents for identity checks. Initially planned as mandatory, it was made optional amid backlash and a petition with nearly 3 million signatures. A full rollout is planned by 2029, with draft documents stating the IDs will include name, date of birth, nationality or residency status, and a biometric photo - but not sex or gender.

"Information about sex and gender is not necessary for the intended purpose of the digital ID," thedocumentsstate, arguing such data does not improve verification, which will rely on "programmatic" checks and "biometric authentication."

However, the notion has raised eyebrows among lawmakers and the public.

"Having struggled for so long to define what a woman is, Labour have now decided it's easier just to abolish the concept entirely," Shadow Equalities Minister Claire Coutinho told GB News on Thursday. "There can be no excuse for failing to accurately record a person's biological sex."

"I don't know whether to laugh or cry... This is ludicrous," former Labour MP Rosie Duffield added. "The idea that one of the most fundamental identifiers... would not even be recorded... makes a farce of the whole idea."

Social media users echoed the criticism, accusing the government of acting out of "fear of the woke mob" and branding the initiative "a joke."

The proposed scheme had already proven controversial. While supporters say it could streamline services and boost security, critics warn it risks turning the UK into a "police state." Concerns include mass surveillance, centralized data vulnerabilities, and a potential "honeypot" for hackers. A February Ipsos pollfound40% of Britons oppose the scheme, with just 32% in favor - a sharp reversal from July 2025, when 57% supported it and 19% opposed.

READ MORE: Starmer appoints Queen of Woke as UKs top civil servant Reform UK

The debate is unfolding amid a wider culture clash in the UK over gender identity, spanning sports, education, healthcare, and single-sex spaces. Starmer has been criticized for trying to straddle both sides: his early remark that it was "not right" to say only women have a cervix sparked backlash, while his later shift toward defining a woman as an "adult human female" was widely seen by critics as a politically driven pivot under pressure.

(RT.com)